Editor in Chief: Moh. Reza Huwaida Thursday, March 28th, 2024

US Should Focus on Afghanistan, Not Pakistan: Gen. Kiyani

US Should Focus on Afghanistan, Not Pakistan: Gen. Kiyani

ISLAMABAD - Pakistan's army chief told parliament's defense committee the United States should focus on stabilizing Afghanistan instead of pushing Pakistan to attack militant groups in a crucial border region, a committee member told Reuters on Wednesday.

Army chief, General AshfaqKayani's comments could deepen a crisis in relations between the United States and Pakistan, whose alliance is critical to efforts to stabilize Afghanistan before the end of 2014, when NATO combat troops are due home.

Kayani said Pakistan alone would decide if and when to launch a full-scale offensive in North Waziristan, which Western intelligence agencies say is a sanctuary for militants who cross the border to attack U.S.-led NATO forces in Afghanistan.

He also said the United States would have to think "10 times" before taking any unilateral action there. Pakistan is not like Iraq or Afghanistan, the parliamentarian quoted Kayani as saying, suggesting that any North Waziristan operation would be very risky.

The MP spoke on condition of anonymity.

"The problem lies in Afghanistan, not Pakistan," the parliamentarian quoted Kayani as telling the committee in a national security briefing at army headquarters.

The United States, the source of billions of dollars in aid, has urged Pakistan over the years to go after militant groups in North Waziristan, a rugged mountainous region where militants have forged ties with powerful tribes.

The pressure has become acute since U.S. Special Forces killed Osama bin Laden in May in a Pakistani garrison town where he had apparently been living for years.

The unilateral raid infuriated Pakistan's powerful military, which described it as a violation of sovereignty. In Washington, some angry officials wondered if elements of Pakistani intelligence had sheltered bin Laden.

Pakistan said it had no idea he was living in the town of Abbottabad, about a two-hour drive from the capital, Islamabad.

Although ties have been severely damaged over the issue of militancy, few expect a complete rupture.

Pakistan's powerful military, which sets security and foreign policy, has been reluctant to attack North Waziristan, saying it was stretched fighting homegrown Taliban fighters elsewhere in Pakistan.

"If someone convinced me that all problems will be solved by taking action in North Waziristan, I'd do it tomorrow," the parliamentarian quoted Kayani as saying.

"If we need to take action, we will do it on our schedule and according to our capacity."

Admiral Mike Mullen said before retiring as chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff last month that the militant Haqqani group that attacked U.S. targets in Afghanistan was a "veritable arm" of Pakistan's spy agency, the Directorate of Inter-Services Intelligence.

The remarks infuriated Pakistani leaders, who denied links to the group and said Pakistan had sacrificed more than any other country that joined the U.S. "war on terror" after the September 11, 2001 attacks on the United States.

The unilateral raid infuriated Pakistan's powerful military, which described it as a violation of sovereignty. In Washington, some angry officials wondered if elements of Pakistani intelligence had sheltered bin Laden.

Pakistan said it had no idea he was living in the town of Abbottabad, about a two-hour drive from the capital, Islamabad. Although ties have been severely damaged over the issue of militancy, few expect a complete rupture.

"All intelligence agencies have contacts. Don't the CIA and (the British spy agency) MI6 have such contacts? It is through these contacts that we get information," the parliamentarian quoted Kayani as saying. (Reuters)